Viewing entries tagged
cost effectiveness

School-based Deworming: A Low-Cost Intervention Achieving High-Impact Benefits

Comment

School-based Deworming: A Low-Cost Intervention Achieving High-Impact Benefits

There is a difference between a low-cost program and a cost-effective program. Implementing a low-cost program is not sufficient - we want to ensure that the impacts of the program are measurable and that the benefits outweigh the costs - this is what makes a program truly cost-effective. Putting these two parts of the equation - costs and benefits - together, we can estimate the value for money of our program.  

Comment

Evidence Action Welcomes New Rigorous Meta Analysis Showing Benefits of  Mass Deworming for Children

Comment

Evidence Action Welcomes New Rigorous Meta Analysis Showing Benefits of Mass Deworming for Children

Today, Evidence Action welcomes the release of a new study that shows that mass deworming of children has a significant positive effect on child weight and is highly cost effective, with a weight gain per dollar 35 times greater than school feeding programs.

This study strongly refutes findings from a previous critique of mass deworming of children in developing countries with high levels of parasitic worms, a Cochrane meta analysis by Taylor-Robinson et al (2015.) that questioned the long-standing World Health Organization (WHO) policy supporting mass deworming.

The new research, “Does Mass Deworming Affect Child Nutrition?: Meta-analysis, Cost-Effectiveness, and Statistical Power” was authored by Kevin Croke, Joan Hamory Hicks, Eric Hsu, Michael Kremer, and Edward Miguel.

Comment